A new duty to review homicides involving offensive weapons is unlikely to achieve its aim of reducing weapons-enabled homicides, whatever else it may accomplish, according to a recent Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (CCJS) publication ‘Learning from Tragedy? The potential benefits, risks, and limitations of offensive weapons homicide reviews’.

Offensive Weapons Homicide Reviews (OWHRs) were introduced by the previous Conservative Government in the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022. Their stated purpose is to help national and local agencies understand the causes of serious violence and prevent future weapons-enabled homicides. The report by Dr Susie Hulley and Dr Tara Young examines the potential benefits and risks of this new duty, particularly its impact on young adult safety. The authors analysed evidence about existing homicide reviews, such as Domestic Violence Homicide Reviews, which have been in operation for several decades.

Homicide reviews, they argue, are not without merit. The research found that reviews can offer additional, important information about what happened, not least of all to a victim’s family and friends. However, the report finds that the recommendations from homicide reviews are frequently not acted upon, raising serious concerns whether the learning from these cases is being effectively implemented – particularly given the lack of statutory duty or resources to do so.

If, after the pilot, OWHRs are rolled out nationally, the report provides recommendations that could mitigate some of the identified risks of existing homicide reviews, including for a publicly accessible national database of findings and recommendations. However, the authors conclude that OWHRs are unlikely to prevent weapon-enabled homicides involving young adults, and urge the government to put well-evidenced interventions that reduce serious violence at the forefront of its approach to serious violence.

A new MoJ ‘process evaluation’ of Newham Y2A Probation Hub, a specialist youth to adulthood transitions service, which Barrow Cadbury Trust’s T2A (Transition to Adulthood Alliance) has supported for several years, has concluded that it is a successful model. The process evaluation took two years to look in detail at the implementation of this specialist young adult Hub in East London.  

The model is based on T2A evidence of what works for young adults. Over the last 20 years, T2A has focused on how best justice services can support young adults to build positive lives away from crime. T2A’s core ask is for a distinct service that takes the best elements from youth justice services and develops them for young adult use. These services would be ‘young adult first,’ trauma-informed, strengths-based, and build strong pro-social identities.  

The Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC), with support from the Ministry of Justice, London Probation Service and the Treasury’s Shared Outcomes fund, set up the Hub in March 2022 to respond to the specific needs of young adults on probation in Newham. It was purposefully and carefully designed to meet the specific needs of young adult, with input from young adults themselves. 

The set up 

A purpose-built space was developed so that young adults could be supported separately to older adults. Young adults were consulted during the design stage and all staff had specialist training in trauma-informed practice, neurodiversity, and developmental maturation. Staff worked with young adults on strengths-based and future-focused approaches. Flexibility around breach and enforcement was part of the ethos, and young adults’ successes were celebrated – a model adapted from youth justice services. 

Alongside the mandatory service provided by probation, probation staff also supported young adults to access voluntary sector services such as mentoring and coaching, speech and language support, restorative justice, and housing support, along with education, training, and employment advice.   Those young adults with mental health needs or who face extra neurodiversity challenges could access creative therapy.  

Findings  

Barrow Cadbury Trust’s ambition in supporting this project was that the Hub would be a template for the delivery of probation services to young adults across England and Wales.  

The key finding of the process evaluation, was that the Hub had the potential to shape young adults’ maturational development and enable them to develop self-belief, build resilience, and regulate their behaviour.  

Staff were positive about the impact of the Hub on young adults’ compliance and engagement, notably in the successful completion of sentences, as well as on young adults’ lives. The bedrock of the service is developing responsibility and forward planning skills that are all important for desistance. The evaluation found that staff were well-informed about the specific challenges facing young adults and supported them in responding to trauma in an informed, and person-centred way. Multiple services all on one site meant same day referrals were possible, and there were relatively short waiting times for first appointments, so that momentum built early on and made building relationships easier.   

The evaluation highlighted the difficult life experiences that these young adults have faced in their short lives, including social and economic disadvantage, poverty and racial discrimination, reflecting the fact that Newham is the second most disadvantaged borough in London. Many had high levels of support needs because of their lack of maturity, their thinking, behaviour, attitudes and lifestyles. The evaluators recognised that these adversities and life changes take time to work through and overcome. Practitioners acknowledged this: “It takes time for young people who haven’t had the same benefits, the positive inputs, the positive attachments, the community. If they haven’t had that, they need time, and time isn’t two years … for long lasting change.” 

How the Hub supported young adults 

This model of delivering probation services to young adults, where the emphasis is on preparing them for a stable adulthood and independence, is significantly different to the offer available to older adults. Six core values  – safety, trust, choice, collaboration, empowerment, and inclusivity are the essence of the Hub’s approach.  

Although it is not the function of probation to turn children into adults, probation services can support the goal of reducing offending by assisting in the young person’s journey to independent adulthood. Young adults interviewed had a sense that maturity is something that develops and with the support of the Hub staff they felt empowered to put in place the building blocks to change their lifestyles.  

It wasn’t just the young adults who recognised the benefits of the Hub. Staff welcomed the greater professional autonomy and flexibility they had as well as the advantages of holding pre-breach interviews before proceedings were necessary.   

Young adults found the Hub a safe and welcoming area to engage, both with their probation officer and in therapeutic activities. This holistic approach made a crucial contribution to long-term positive outcomes. The wraparound support gives young adults the space to grow and learn about themselves.  

The evaluation found that the Hub’s emphasises on cultural awareness and gender-specific services was appreciated by staff and young adults. This emphasis ensures that the diverse backgrounds and experiences of individuals are respected and valued, fostering a sense of belonging and understanding. The gender-specific approach recognises the unique needs and challenges faced by women, and how important  tailored support is in a separate space, alongside other women’s services.  

Outcomes/Experiences 

One objective of the hub is to improve partnership working and information sharing between services so that young adults are less likely to fall through the net when children’s services support falls away at 18. The evaluation found that staff were able to develop strong, collaborative, trusted relationships with each other, with a shared purpose, and gain knowledge, formal and informally, from specialist professionals, a greater diversity of partners, as well as tapping into ongoing training and development. Probation officers benefitted from more time with young adults due to smaller caseloads. 

The future 

So far, more than 400 young adults have engaged with probation services in the Y2A Hub. The evaluation has demonstrated that success or failure of the service cannot be captured solely in reoffending data.  T2A agrees with the evaluators that stage-specific services which help young people develop into mature adults are crucial. But we also recognise the importance of finding metrics for a young adult’s growth in their outlook, perceptions, maturity and self-identity. 

The fact that staff and young adults interviewed were unanimously in favour of rolling out similar hubs in other parts of London and more widely is testament to the value of the model and the careful evidence-informed work that went into its planning. This is an innovation that the Government should be grasping with both hands, in line with its mission to “reduce the barriers to opportunity” and its ambition to tackle violence amongst young people.  And the probation service deserves huge credit for putting evidence into practice and in so doing showing that the principles espoused by T2A have benefited young adults involved in the justice system.  

This positive evaluation and the 20 years of T2A’s experience strongly underpin the need for young adults to receive specialist support, delivered in dedicated settings. 

Georgia Barnett is a psychologist and researcher, and partner at KTA Research and Consulting who specialise in bringing evidence into criminal justice practice. Georgia worked for HMPPS for 22 years, and spent the last 10 years working in the HMPPS Evidence-Based Practice Team. Georgia has written a series of shorts blogs for T2A, providing a snapshot of the young adult evidence base.

What do we mean by trauma?

There isn’t a single agreed definition of trauma, but experts say this involves both events that are experienced as extremely harmful and an adverse reaction to those events that has long-lasting, negative impacts that get in the way of a person’s normal functioning.

What do we know about trauma and young adults in the justice system?

A 2017 report by Beyond Youth Custody looked at published research and reports about trauma among young people in the criminal justice system and found:

• Trauma is more common in young adults in prison than in the general population.
• Common types of trauma among young adults in prison include the experience of childhood abuse, loss, victimisation, mental health issues and brain injury.
• Women are more likely than men in prison to have suffered a range of trauma, including sexual abuse and family violence.
• Trauma is more common in the histories of people who display aggression, engage in antisocial or offending behaviour, including violent or sexual offending, who gamble, and who misuse substances, than those who don’t engage in these behaviours.
• Trauma makes it more likely that individuals will suffer from certain mental health difficulties including depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and more generally, from anxiety and stress, and perceptions of low self-worth.¹

More recent research based on interviews with young adults serving long sentences in England suggests that those who have previously experienced trauma find life in prison more challenging than their peers.² This research also found that young adults serving long prison sentences can find it difficult to talk about trauma because they might not want to admit or show vulnerability, might not see adverse experiences as traumatic, have problems with memory about childhood events, or don’t have the language or emotional literacy to talk about this issue.

What can we do to support young adults experiencing the effects of trauma?

Research with young adults in prison suggests that we should:

• recognise that young adults may have experienced trauma themselves as result of their offending behaviour. When encouraging young adults to talk about trauma, it might be more helpful to identify, explore and work on the causes of specific issues that could stem from trauma, like sleep or appetite problems.
• recognise and work on issues with self-compassion, loss, and grief.
• be careful not to judge risk and need prematurely, as denial of risk and harm can be a way young adults might cope with their sentence. Adjustment to long sentences could be particularly difficult for those young adults who have a history of trauma.
• use a strengths-based approach which makes the most of existing strengths, and builds resilience, support systems, and new, helpful ways of coping.
• meet the young adults where they are, understanding and working with rather than against any apparent resistance or lack of motivation to engage, and working at a pace that helps them to change and develop.
• ensure people working with young adults have a good knowledge of the impact of trauma and aim to use trauma-informed practices which focus on creating safe, predictable environments, and strong, trusting relationships.
• involve partner agencies (e.g., social services and mental health services) to provide co-ordinated, integrated and holistic care.

Trauma-informed practice (TIP) is an approach that could help young adults in prison or on probation. TIP means staff are aware of and skilled in responding appropriately to how trauma might impact on how someone feels or behaves, and that organisational cultures and practices do not allow a person’s trauma to get in the way of their access to services.³ TIP usually involves: 1) creating a sense of safety, 2) building and maintaining trust in the organisation and in relationships, 3) giving choice, 4) collaborating, 5) empowering the individual, and 6) being inclusive.⁴

More information and free resources about working with trauma, and trauma informed practice are available from Intermediaries for Justice and the Youth Justice Resource Hub.

1. Beyond Youth Custody (2017). Trauma and young offenders – a review of the research and practice literature. Trauma-and-young-offenders-a-review-of-the-research-and-practice-literature.pdf (beyondyouthcustody.net) ↩︎
2. O’Rourke, R. (2022). The nature and impact of trauma in young adult male prisoners: screening for trauma and exploring the experience both past and present. Available at: https://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/473 ↩︎
3. Petrillo, M., & Bradley, A. (2022). Working with Trauma in Adult Probation: HMIP Research and Analysis Bulletin 2022/02. Available at: Working with trauma in adult probation (justiceinspectorates.gov.uk) ↩︎
4. Bradley, A. (2021). Viewing Her Majesty’s Prison Service through a trauma-informed lens. Prison Service Journal, 255, 4-11. ↩︎

Young Adult Evidence Snapshot

What does research tell us about young adults from ethnic minorities in the justice system?

Read more

Georgia Barnett is a psychologist and researcher, and partner at KTA Research and Consulting who specialise in bringing evidence into criminal justice practice. Georgia worked for HMPPS for 22 years, and spent the last 10 years working in the HMPPS Evidence-Based Practice Team. Georgia has written a series of shorts blogs for T2A, providing a snapshot of the young adult evidence base.

A small number of studies have looked at what young adults, and people working with young adults in the criminal justice system in England and Wales, think helps to create positive relationships that support rehabilitation.

Building positive relationships with young adults on probation

A review of probation practice found that strong and constructive relationships with young adults are more likely to develop if practitioners:

• Approach the work as an ally rather than as an authority.
• Listen and adopt a genuine and understanding approach.
• Demonstrate the behaviour they want to see, for example being reliable, punctual, respectful, and following through on tasks.
• View ruptures in the relationship as an opportunity for the young adult to learn about relationships, conflict, and how to repair those connections.
• Have the chance to explore and process difficulties in developing and maintaining relationships with young adults in structured supervision with other professionals/peers.¹

Building positive relationships with young adults in prison

One small study exploring how to work with young adult prisoners with emerging personality difficulties and who were deemed to have a high risk of reoffending, found taking a generally validating and consistent approach, using persistence, honesty, praise, mutual respect, and setting limits on problematic behaviour were all key to developing and maintaining positive relationships with this group.²

Building positive relationships with young adults in voluntary services

• Similarly, a study of a voluntary sector model which had been used in England to engage 414 young adults convicted of crime (ranging from 16 to 25 years old) found the following affected how engaged this group were with the service:
• Attitude and approach of staff – recruiting staff to work with young adults who believe they can change and want to build positive, hopeful relationships with them. A number of young adults said their relationship with the staff was more like a friend than a worker. They valued feeling they could talk to their worker about anything and feeling they genuinely cared about them.
• Reliability and consistency – staff who followed through with what they said they would do, reinforcing their commitment to working with the young adult.
• Reciprocity – this was expressed by one young adult: “if we didn’t see each other as much and she helped me out as much, I don’t think I’d be willing to co-operate as much, but she does help out a lot”. Another described being motivated to not let their worker down.
• Holistic provision – in this model, where possible, the workers themselves provided the support, advice and/or intervention to meet the young adult’s needs. When the worker couldn’t help (e.g. because they needed specialist support), they would make the referral. For the young adults, it was important that their worker was willing and had the capacity to address the issues that were important to them, regardless of whether it was related to their offending. They valued having a single person to rely on for help, who understood them and who they trusted.³

What do young adults tell us is important in relationships with justice workers?

Taken together, these studies suggest that young adults value genuineness, transparency, reliability, consistency, validation, collaboration, understanding, mutual respect and boundaries, and the provision of practical help that meets a wide range of needs, as foundations of positive, rehabilitative relationships with justice professionals.

1. Judd, P., Lewis, S. (2015). Working against the odds: How probation practitioners can support desistance ↩︎
2. Shaw, J. and Forster, O. (2017). How do high-risk young adult prisoners with emerging personality disorders describe the process of change in therapy? Journal of forensic practice. Volume 20. No 1.pp. 32-41 ↩︎
3. Wong, K., Kinsella, R., Meadows, L. (2018). Developing a Voluntary Sector Model for Engaging Offenders. The Howard Journal Vol 57 No 4. pp. 556–575 ↩︎

Young Adult Evidence Snapshot

What does research tell us about young adults in the justice system and trauma?

Read more

Georgia Barnett is a psychologist and researcher, and partner at KTA Research and Consulting who specialise in bringing evidence into criminal justice practice. Georgia worked for HMPPS for 22 years, and spent the last 10 years working in the HMPPS Evidence-Based Practice Team. Georgia has written a series of shorts blogs for T2A, providing a snapshot of the young adult evidence base.

People from ethnic minorities are disproportionately represented at all points of contact with the criminal justice system and this is most pronounced among children and young adults.¹

What do young adults from ethnic minorities tell us about their experience in prisons and with probation services?

Research capturing the voices of black and ethnic minority people in prisons and on probation in England and Wales tells us that:

• Young adult men have more negative experiences of prisons and have poorer well-being in prison compared to older prisoners; young black men report the worst experience of all young adults.²
• In a 2020 study, young black men with experience of the justice system felt the decisions made about them did not feel appropriate, and that authority figures assumed they were involved in gangs. They said their behaviour was often interpreted as aggressive, and they were offered fewer opportunities for rehabilitation compared to their white peers in prison.³
• Young black men reported a range of barriers to accessing care and support in prison, for example, being more likely to be perceived as dangerous than white men, which also meant they were more likely to have force used against them.⁴
• In a report published by HMI Probation in 2021, many ethnic minority people on probation did not feel that probation staff had a good understanding of their culture, religion, heritage or experiences and were reluctant to enter discussion about these issues or discuss their experiences of racism and discrimination.⁵
• The same HMIP report found that young adults from Gypsy, Roma, or Traveller (GRT) ethnic groups face distinct challenges in the criminal justice system and are routinely misidentified in prison.⁶ GRT prisoners reported needing more help to stay in contact with friends and family when in custody than prisoners from other backgrounds.⁷
• Female prisoners from GRT communities were more likely than other female prisoners to have complex needs, to experience bullying/victimisation from other prisoners and were more likely to report feeling unsafe.⁸

What can we do to improve the experience and outcomes of young adults from ethnic minorities?

There isn’t much evaluation of interventions and services for people from ethnic minorities in prison and probation settings. In a small study of a prison-based personality disorder service, young black and minority ethnic men identified several barriers to engagement with the service.⁹ Many had a concern that others – peers, family, and staff – would think badly of them for engaging with the service. The young men felt that their unique needs would not be fully understood by staff working there, a view that was influenced by negative experiences of contact with other services. The young men said that peer encouragement, staff investment in relationships with ethnic minority prisoners, and being offered choice within the service, would help improve their experience.

More recently, a report by Spark Inside, based on interviews with young adult prisoners, made a number of suggestions for better responding to the needs of young black men in custody including:

• Recognition by staff of the different backgrounds, cultures, inequalities and experiences (including experiences of racism and discrimination) of young black men.
• Making sure young black men have a voice and are heard in custody.
• A focus on identity, to help build a positive, prosocial sense of self and challenge negative perceptions linked to race, culture, faith and masculinity.
• Using black-led or black specialist organisations to deliver services and support to this group.¹⁰

1. David Lammy MP (2017). The Lammy Review. UK Government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/lammy-review-final-report ↩︎
2. Spark Inside (2023). Being Well, Being Equal. BWBE Report Final V.2 – DIGITAL Spreads REDUCED 21-02_1.pdf (sparkinside.org) ↩︎
3. Leaders Unlocked. (2020). Young Adult Advisors On Criminal Justice: Hearing from Young Adults in the Criminal Justice System. Available at: http://leaders-unlocked.org/luwp/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/YoungAdvisorsonCriminalJustice_final-pdf.pdf ↩︎
4. Spark Inside. (2023). Being Well, Being Equal: Prioritising the wellbeing of young men and young Black men in the criminal justice system. Barrow Cadbury Trust. Available at: https://barrowcadbury.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/BWBE-Report-Final-V.2-DIGITAL-Spreads-REDUCED-21-02-1.pdf ↩︎
5. HMIP (2021). Race equality in probation: the experiences of black, Asian and minority ethnic probation service users and staff. Race equality in probation: the experiences of black, Asian and minority ethnic probation service users and staff (justiceinspectorates.gov.uk) ↩︎
6. HMIP (2020). Minority Ethnic Prisoners’ Experience of Rehabilitation and Release Planning. Minority ethnic prisoners’ experiences of rehabilitation and release planning: A thematic review by HM Inspectorate of Prisons (October 2020) (justiceinspectorates.gov.uk) ↩︎
7. Ibid. ↩︎
8. HMIP (2020). Minority Ethnic Prisoners’ Experience of Rehabilitation and Release Planning. Minority ethnic prisoners’ experiences of rehabilitation and release planning: A thematic review by HM Inspectorate of Prisons (October 2020) (justiceinspectorates.gov.uk) ↩︎
9. Hunter, S., Craig, E. and Shaw, J. (2018). “Give it a Try”: experiences of black, Asian and minority ethnic young men in a prison-based offender personality disorder service. Journal of forensic practice. Vol 21. No 1. pp. 14-26 ↩︎
10. Spark Inside (2023). Being Well, Being Equal: Prioritising the wellbeing of young men and young Black men in the criminal justice system. Barrow Cadbury Trust. Available at: https://barrowcadbury.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/BWBE-Report-Final-V.2-DIGITAL-Spreads-REDUCED-21-02-1.pdf ↩︎

Young Adult Evidence Snapshot

What does research tell us about building positive relationships with young adults?

Read more

In March, we held our T2A (Transition to Adulthood) Alliance meeting – a quarterly gathering of organisations working towards improving outcomes for young adults. One of our guest speakers was Sarah Carlsen-Browne, Senior Manager for Reducing Reoffending at Devon and Cornwall Police, who spoke about their enhanced service for 18-25 years olds and those with care experience.

Sarah Carlsen-Browne began by speaking to the assembled Alliance members about how crucial it is for the public to have a positive perception of diversion schemes.

That’s why, Sarah says, it’s crucial to focus on the facts. Research shows that adults released from custodial sentences of less than 12 months have a reoffending rate of 57.5%¹.

Sarah adds: “We know formal processing is less effective for low level offending, and the evidence for diversion is much more compelling. But culture change is vital to shift negative perceptions.”

Sarah argues that a more nuanced approach is required – one that recognises that young adults who commit low-level offences have often been failed by the system on multiple occasions. To reinforce this point, Sarah pointed to a finding in The Lammy Review:

“Many prisoners arrive in custody as damaged individuals. In the youth estate, 33% arrive with mental health problems, whilst a similar proportion presents with learning difficulties. A third of children in prison have spent time in the care system, 45% arrive with substance misuse problems and 61% have a track record of disengagement with education.²”

This was one of several factors that prompted Devon and Cornwall Police to develop a new Out of Court Resolution (OOCR) scheme to reduce reoffending amongst 18-25-years olds and care leavers.

The scheme takes a strength-based approach to working with young adults – helping them to take positive steps towards a pro-social identity. It also helps individuals to be mindful of the harm they may have caused and the consequences of their behaviour.

Sarah describes the attitude adopted by professionals as:

“We’ll be open-minded, curious and aspirational about individuals coming to police attention and think creatively about how we can prevent future harm and demand.”

The day-to-day operations are handled by two key workers who are trained in how to sensitively respond to young adults’ needs. For example, they can meet young adults away from official places like police stations.

“We always ensure that we recruit the right individuals for these roles, and they are trained in everything they need to know to work successfully with young adults once in post.”

All young adults who enter the scheme have access to the following:

• Neurodiversity screening using the Do-It Justice Profiler tool.
• A personalised budget to engage in employment and education opportunities.
• Pre-prosecution mental health provision.

“Four years on from completing my Pathfinder {now called OOCR} course, I haven’t gotten into any trouble, and I am now working full time in my ideal job and also in a relationship. Life is going well.” (Young Adult)

Key workers carry out a holistic needs and risk assessment to identify the young adult’s strengths and needs.

Devon and Cornwall Police don’t commission services, but they have built relationships with the voluntary sector and local organisations to develop interventions. After a referral has been made to an appropriate organisation, a joint handover meeting is held between the young adult, their key worker, and a representative from the organisation.

The key worker maintains an active relationship with the young adult throughout and is on hand to offer support as needed.

Sarah explains, “This is not about processing people. It’s about building relationships.”

Every young adult enters a four-month contract. All young adults must comply with the following contract requirements:

• No reoffending
• Restorative and reparation conditions
• Rehabilitation programme based on holistic assessment

Engagement with the contract conditions is reviewed based on how the young adult has engaged with the key worker. Sarah reported that there have been few breaches.

Once the contact is completed, the young adult has a meeting with their key worker to review their progress, offer feedback, and agree an exit strategy – ensuring they can continue to develop, grow, and realise their full potential.

Successful completion will result in no further action. If additional support is required, the young adult can stay connected to the service after the four-month period ends.

Peer hearing

A pilot community court designed by and for young adults

Read more

1. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/proven-reoffending-statistics-january-to-march-2020/proven-reoffending-statistics-january-to-march-2020 ↩︎
2. Pg 47: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a82009040f0b62305b91f49/lammy-review-final-report.pdf ↩︎

Julia and Jordan are key workers for the Devon and Cornwall pilot out of court resolution scheme, which has been in operation for the last 18 months. We recently spoke to Julia and Jordan and some of their clients about how this scheme is helping young adults to make positive changes in their lives.

From the outset, Julia and Jordan recognised that young adults require a distinct approach that responds to their entire lived experience. This is crucial as many of their clients have been affected by trauma, abuse, violence and deprivation.

Jordan explains, “Some of the young adults I’ve worked with have had significant adverse childhood experiences. Reading some cases, I’ve thought to myself, ‘How have you only just come to the police’s attention now?’”

Julia adds, “Most of the time, they’ve not really been given the tools to be an adult. There are very few people we see that haven’t been a victim themselves or let down by the system.

“One of the things that we would do more of with this age group is issue regular reminders of appointments. I find that if we see them more often then that momentum of change comes easier. If you don’t see them very often, other things take over and they can disengage from the process.”

Jordan adds, “I always try my best to keep the appointments as concise and practical as possible and not paper based.”

Having dedicated key workers means more attention can be given to each individual. Jordan believes that this allows him to take a much more active role in supporting his clients – even when he’s referring someone to other services.

“You’re not just this referral mechanism. You’re working with each individual to understand what they need.

“For example, I’m working with this young guy called Chris* who’s 21 and was arrested for self-harming in public.

“I asked if he wanted mental health support, which he did, so I made a referral. Within a week, I’ve been able take him over in person to meet his counsellor. Chris is now having up to 12 weekly sessions, which we’re able to access for him through the deferred prosecution scheme. If we hadn’t been able to get that, he’d probably be facing a four-month wait for therapy through the NHS.”

Chris was at a point of crisis, but he has found the therapy sessions hugely beneficial. He says, “I’d tried so many times to get help with my mental health, then it all came to a head. Being able to quickly get support when I needed it the most was really important to me. My counsellor actually listens and remembers things about me. I feel lighter after having a session with her.”

When a good relationship has been established, Julia finds that she can then focus on helping young adults to pursue their aspirations.

“When I started working with Peter*, he was depressed and had withdrawn completely from the community. We did an empowerment activity together, and it came out of this exercise that he had a particular talent and interest in video editing.

“We gave him a variety of tasks to help him develop his skills, including approaching a charity to offer to provide a video they could use to promote their work. For this project, he learned how to work on a storyboard and use video editing software. Peter completed the project and is now on his way to a freelance career in videography.”

Peter adds, “My life is much better, and I haven’t got a sense of guilt anymore. The deferred charge focussed on why I did what I did, why it shouldn’t have happened but also empowered me to move on and focus on my goals.

“I haven’t got a criminal record. I was given an opportunity to use this part of my life to become better, not for it to negatively affect me in the future.”

Jordan and Julia believe that having a personalised budget for each client makes it easier to offer tailored support and interventions.

Jordan explains, “I was working with a young person called Steve* recently who’d had a poor experience of mainstream education and was out of work.

“He was working with a bandofbrothers, which is another good service down here that provide role models and one-to-one mentoring. Steve wanted to get into labouring, and so he needed to do his CSCS (Construction Skills Certification Scheme).

“I spent £13 to get him a train ticket up to the centre to do his initial assessment for a CSCS card. By the time he left the scheme, he had a bricklaying job on a site. That was all down to his strength and motivation and just spending about £13 with the personalised budget. That was enough for Steve to get across that line.”

Steve adds, “I was able to get my CSCS card through the Deferred Charge Scheme, which helped me get a job. It also meant that I didn’t get done for the offences, which would have made getting a job even harder.”

Julia and Jordan both speak effusively about how the scheme has empowered many young adults to shift to a pro-social identity. They share numerous examples of how the young adults they’ve worked with have improved their mental health, pursued careers and life goals, and made reparations to those affected by their actions.

Through the enhanced service, Jordan and Julia can support individuals beyond four months on a voluntary basis. Despite the clear benefits offered, shifting police officers’ perceptions of the scheme has been challenging at times.

“This is not a soft option. Young adults coming on to the scheme have to confront what’s causing them to commit crime and that can be quite tough,” Jordan explains.

Julia adds, “Our clients feel the weight of being under the deferred charge because the circles they’re moving in could lead them to reoffend or to substance misuse. That’s a challenge for them.

“But I let my clients know that it’s not always a straight line and to not disappear if they have a drink, for example. It’s not the fact that you’ve had a blip. It’s about making distance between the blips bigger. That’s progress.”

Ryan* is one of the young adult clients who’s been supported through significant setbacks on a voluntary basis.

Ryan explains, “My life has improved one thousand percent. I was drinking alcohol daily and using crack before the deferred charge. Through the deferred charge I was clean for eight weeks, then was made homeless and went back to it for a week.

“My keyworker didn’t give up on me. They contacted the right agencies and helped me with the food bank. I have been clean for three weeks again now. If I had gone to court there would have been a judge and a solicitor, but no one there after to help me with the addiction that led me to be arrested.

“It would be easy to go back to my old life, but I’m avoiding people and places that would take me back. I have support, and my keyworker for as long as I need her, to get on my feet properly.”

*We have used pseudonyms in this interview to protect each young adult’s identity

Read about research and practice to identify effective approaches for young adults throughout the criminal justice system.

Research and reports

The 2021 Criminal Justice Joint Inspectorate report ‘Neurodiversity in the Criminal Justice System’ highlighted that the prevalence of neurodiversity is much higher than has previously been reported. Encountering the criminal justice system is incredibly stressful and worrying, especially for young adults who require additional support. That’s why we recently spoke to Professor Huw Williams and PhD Researcher Hope Kent from The University of Exeter about their work in this area and how the current system can be improved.

Assessments in police custody

Young adults can present with various needs, including acquired brain injury (ABI), neurodiversity, ADHD, autism, as well as language and communication issues. Huw recognises that this can be daunting for professionals.

“How do we bring in a system for people to better recognise the signs and signals of neurodisability? We don’t want frontline staff to be overwhelmed by the complexity of the information but to be better equipped in the interaction with the person and think about how to support them because they’re vulnerable.”

32% of under 18s interviewed in the secure estate have a learning disability¹ (compared to about 4% of the general population). Unfortunately, similar data related to young adults aged 18 to 25 is not documented. However, we can safely assume that a significant number of young adults are coming into custody with additional needs.

That makes the screening process crucial. If young adults are properly assessed at this first point of contact with the justice system, their charges can be mitigated, and they can be diverted into local support systems. Particularly for those aged 18-25, proper screening could be the difference between being supported by an Appropriate Adult in police custody or not.

“We have supported various projects to help police to screen for brain trauma. Hope and I did some work with Devon and Cornwall Police, specifically with their Pathfinder diversion program. The team fed back that they saw the need to pick up on mild brain injury more effectively so that staff could be more mindful of how it affects people and make appropriate adjustments – which could be simple, like issuing regular reminders for appointments.”

As police forces operate independently, it’s challenging for best practice approaches, like this project in Devon and Cornwall, to be shared widely. Instead, there are often pockets of good practice.

Risk versus vulnerability

Earlier this year, Hope was working on a research project exploring the impact of the PACE safeguards on the detention and questioning of children in custody². She requested custody record data from the 43 territorial police forces in England and Wales. One of the factors examined in the project was the quality of information police forces were recording about the vulnerability of children appearing in custody.

She explains: “We heard back from 12 forces who could provide us with electronic datasets – eight of which were of high enough quality to include in our analysis. The vulnerability flags that police forces use varied hugely across the 12 forces and were generally collected under the heading of ‘person warning flags’. The number of electronically recorded ‘person warning flags’ ranged from 3 in some forces, to 12 in others. They also ranged significantly – including ‘Mental Health’, ‘Mental Disorder’, ‘Suicidal’, ‘Escaper’, ‘Drugs’, ‘Contagious’, amongst others.

“Flags for things that might make a child or young person particularly vulnerable in police custody, such as a mental health condition, are collected along the same lines as flags for their management in custody, such as ‘escaper’.”

“It’s clear that the vulnerability flags are not fit for purpose, and the consistent electronic recording of more detailed information would enable proper enforcement of safeguards for children and young people who need them.”

A unified approach to screening

The picture that starts to emerge is one where people’s vulnerability is viewed through a lens of risk, rather than a supportive lens that seeks to identify appropriate support or interventions. Hope believes that a more joined-up approach will help improve the situation.

“In South Wales, there are people working in police custody who understand this problem and have put screening in place, but there needs to be top-down management of what the forces are expected to collect.

“The quality of the data that police forces can easily access electronically was poor. The police forces don’t have to electronically report this data back to the home office and, without this requirement to report on people’s vulnerability, it’s incredibly hard to understand what’s going on ‘on the ground’ in custody suites.

“Asking for quality, routine data collection would make sure police forces ask questions about vulnerability in a much more consistent way.”

Effective identification of brain injury and neurodiversity

Huw Williams and Hope Kent are currently working on a research project with Thames Valley Police force. Huw and Hope were tasked with reviewing how neurodevelopmental issues and trauma may increase a young adult’s likelihood of coming into contact with the criminal justice system.

The aim is to be able to effectively identify experiences in someone’s background that may be indicative of a brain injury, and to help the police to divert people into appropriate rehabilitation services.

“We’re working with Thames Valley to work out what’s appropriate to screen for too because there’s lots of issues when children are involved as the courts can use information gained during the screening process against young women,” Hope explains.

“Police sometimes aren’t the best agency to have very sensitive information about people, but they’re often the ‘first responders’ in situations like domestic violence. So, we have to ask, what actually should go on record, what should be screened for, what the police should know about to support that person, and whether a functional assessment of what that person might be struggling with is better than having a brain injury on record?”

Functional assessments versus diagnostic assessments

Hope has also worked with Professor Amanda Kirby who created the Do-IT Profiler screening tool – a holistic assessment that considers an individual’s whole experience.

“Amanda was getting frustrated with diverse needs like autism and ADHD not being picked up and assessed properly. Do-IT Profiler operates in schools, universities, workplaces, but also in the prison system.

“They’ve worked collaboratively with prisons to design assessments that give staff the information they need to be able to support someone in education and also in their reintegration into the community.

“Do-IT is designed to be very holistic – they conduct whole person assessments. They collect somebody’s education history. Were they ever in care? Who did they live with before they came to prison? Are they struggling with homelessness, substance use, medical problems? Have they ever been diagnosed with the neurodisability?”

This innovative tool also incorporates a variety of functional assessments to better understand what support a young adult might require.

“The tools include both self-reporting and cognitive assessments – to help prison officers understand whether an individual has the skills they need to be able to go to probation appointments, for example. Do we know if they can read a bus timetable? It then produces a report for the prison that says this person might struggle with their memory, for example, and here are some simple techniques you could use to help them.”

What’s unique about this tool is the focus on function over diagnosis. This means prison staff don’t have to be experts in multiple conditions to understand what support a young adult might need.

International approaches to young adults and neurodiversity

Huw has also been looking at how criminal justice systems in other countries are supporting young neurodiverse adults.

“There are some really nice examples in the US of having social workers involved in policing, so instead of going down the arrest route, you’d be going down the support route. In New Zealand, there’s been shifts in the system so that, up to the age of 25, you are much more likely to be assessed for a neurodisability to see what support you need. So instead of going into the prison system, you’re given a community order.

“60 or 70% of police work is supporting people who are vulnerable, but this is the wrong place for people to end up. A shift in what policing does is really important, a move towards a trauma-informed supportive stance.

“But you need a system in place for that to happen, and for the police to have confidence in this approach, and local stakeholders and crime commissioners to have a stake in that and see the purpose in that.”

Bringing all the partners to the table

It’s clear that a joined-up approach – involving local health and social care partners – is needed across the criminal justice system to ensure that young neurodiverse adults are properly assessed, given appropriate support, and diverted away from crime.

“We need better systems with all the stakeholders engaged and sharing information. Rather than escalate things down the criminal justice route, you can have a more supportive response.

“What we’re calling for would be adoption of a youth justice system, in the sense that you know the young person who’s in the system is the product of what’s happened to them in early life – including adverse childhood experiences – and the responses from education, health, and social care systems. The point of the justice system should be to alert us to what support they need. But the current system doesn’t do that.”

“There’s a level of ignorance, a not wanting to understand” – Raising Awareness of Acquired Brain Injury (ABI)

Read more

1. http://psychology.exeter.ac.uk/documents/Nobody_made_the_connection_Neurodevelopment%20Report_OCC_October2012.pdf ↩︎
2. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Kemp-Examining-the-impact-of-PACE-on-the-detention-and-questioning-of-child-suspects.pdf ↩︎

T2A Chair Leroy Logan MBE reflects on the findings of the Alliance for Youth Justice’s (AYJ) briefing paper on the transition from the youth to adult justice system – focusing on the experiences of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic young people.

A spotlight on racial disparities

As the briefing suggests, young people who turn 18 while in contact with the justice system face a steep cliff edge. Studies show that this age is a crucial turning point where many young people begin to desist from crime with the right support and interventions. But rather than take advantage of this capacity for change, statutory services fall away. For Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic young people, the transition to the adult justice system can be even more challenging.

This latest briefing from AYJ has cast a harsh spotlight on the failings of our justice system to address the racial disparities that have blighted many young people’s lives. From an early age, many Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic young people find themselves associated with criminal stereotypes. Labelling young people in this way is incredibly damaging, eroding self-belief and making it harder to move towards a pro-social identity.

Once Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic children enter the justice system, they are less likely to be diverted, more likely to receive harsher sentences, and more likely to be sent to custody, sentenced or on remand, compared to white children¹.

“Guilty before proven innocent… you kind of learn authority figures don’t actually care.”

Young Person

This can create a huge gulf in understanding and trust between Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic young adults and the professionals working in the system.

Sadly, these findings confirm what many of us working in the sector already expected. That’s why I welcome AYJ drilling down into the causes of this crisis, and what needs to change to deliver better outcomes.

Too often, we focus solely on what’s not working and forget that we must create a roadmap for the future we wish to see.

An overstretched and under resourced system

It’s clear that even with a diverse workforce, culturally competent training, and the best will in the world, the probation service is struggling to keep its head above water.

A professional quoted in the briefing had this to say:

“Record levels of staff sickness, extended sick leave, people fleeing the service in droves – that then exacerbates every other issue we have. We can’t be ambitious, we can’t be progressive, we can’t make many changes if you’re barely able to keep the regime running.”

There are many admirable professionals working in the system who want to do better for young adults, but they don’t have the time, resources, or support to implement creative approaches.

Without sufficient investment, the system can barely meet young adults’ basic needs – let alone support them to take steps towards a more positive future.

Collaboration with the VCSE sector

In this depressing climate, the work of voluntary and community organisations has become even more vital.

Specialist Black and Ethnic Minority-led organisations have an intimate understanding of the communities Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic young people come from and how their experiences inform their behaviour and identity. As the research highlights, these grassroots organisations are well placed to provide nuanced support that recognises these young people’s overlapping needs – support that statutory services would struggle to provide.

These organisations are also more likely to have lived experience embedded in their staff and support services, meaning they can provide peer mentoring and positive role models – both of which are essential components in facilitating the shift towards a pro-social identity.

Ring-fenced funding to commission specialist organisations

I believe that we could take this further by developing a model where specialist Black and Minority-Ethnic led grassroots organisations are commissioned to operate services in their communities. Funding would be ring fenced for these local organisations who have the expertise to deliver the best outcomes.

This model could be supported by local roundtables where information and knowledge are shared regularly so that young adults can access support from multiple agencies. Meeting in this way will also help criminal justice agencies better understand how these organisations are well placed to support young adults. Having buy in from all partners will be vital to the success of this model.

The Newham Transition to Adulthood Hub is a great example of how this approach can work in practice. They have a wide variety of services in one space, so staff can consult each other on individual cases and referrals to different services are much easier and more efficient. Regular spotlight sessions are held where different teams share their expertise and explain how their services can benefit young adults.

Grassroots organisations excluded from funding opportunities

Unfortunately, the AYJ’s report found that organisations with strong community links and knowledge are effectively excluded from funding opportunities. They lack the resources to compete with larger organisations who can meet the excessive commissioning processes and compliance requirements demanded by the Ministry of Justice and HMPPS.

However, many of these larger organisations lack the knowledge and cultural competence to successfully deliver these services. Shockingly, they often subcontract their services at a lower rate to the very grassroots organisations that have been denied a place at the table.

It is crucial that the Ministry of Justice and HMPPS immediately reform VCS funding allocation so that specialist Black and Minority-Ethnic led grassroots organisations can build the capacity of their services – ensuring every young person receives age-appropriate, trauma-informed, culturally competent services that reflect their entire lived experience.

Bridging gaps and changing tracks

Alliance for Youth Justice briefing on supporting racially minoritised young people transitioning from the youth to adult justice system.

Read report

1. xxvii Microsoft Word – BAME research report_final_v4.docx (publishing.service.gov.uk); Centre for Justice Innovation (2021) Equal diversion? Racial disproportionality in youth diversion; JUSTICE (2021) Tackling Racial Injustice – Children and the Youth Justice System ↩︎

Leaders Unlocked supports young people from diverse backgrounds to influence change on the issues that affect their lives. It was founded by Rose Dowling in 2015 with the belief that any young person could become a leader if the right conditions were created for them to thrive.

Since 2015 Leaders Unlocked projects have provided young people with the space, support, and tools they need to lead. Completely youth-led, Leaders Unlocked enables young people to define their own priorities, produce their own research, develop recommendations and co-produce solutions.

In 2020, Leaders Unlocked established a Youth Board – a group of motivated young leaders representing all of its work areas: criminal justice, education, health, and policing. These young leaders are helping to drive Leaders Unlocked’s growth as an organisation – working on its strategy, business development, partnerships, media and communications. The Youth Board of Leaders Unlocked have co-produced and authored this Impact Report – a vibrant record of its collective achievement over the last 6 years.

Follow @LeadersUnlocked